On the one hand, this article is a review of the use experience of the new Meizu Pro 5 hand. On the one hand, after the comparison is in hand, it can be said that Flyme 5 and miui 8 (about millet 5 and some miui experience can be seen before me Of the article: A passerby's Amy Homage on Millet 5) Two current state-of-the-art Android ROM usage experiences.
The Meizu Pro 5 in hand is a second-hand product of the Amoy Fish (although the sellers keep it very well, the whole machine is as new), the local transaction in person, the transaction price is 1300 Ocean, there is no packing box and other miscellaneous items, only the mobile phone and charging Line heads, so even fake out of the box can not do it (but afterwards only think that you can take a photo with the seller oh).
Want to buy new friends can look at this:
Anyway, the focus of this article is not the experience of the Meizu Pro 5, but rather the two ROMs, Flyme and Miui, as the center to talk about the experience of customizing Android machines in China. Of course, talking about mobile phone software system is bound to not bypass the hardware itself, this article will not evade the hardware content of these two Meizu Pro 5 and millet 5 machines. In addition, Miui and Flyme are based on Miui 8 (8.6.7.24 development version) and Flyme 5 (5.6.8.23 beta) respectively.
First, the design conceptAfter Flyme's changes after 5.0, the gap between miui (or ROM, which is closer to the Android native specification) has been greatly reduced, and there is more overlap in the final realization of the design.
However, in general, Flyme is in contrast with miui, miui is more approaching Android natives in terms of interaction with hardware, and is more in pursuit of ROM's wider adaptability in hardware, interaction in ROM and hardware. Contact customization is relatively less. At the same time, miui is more controllable within the scope of ROM, and the high degree of customization in software means that the space for personal customization left for users is also more limited. Flyme does the opposite in this respect, has more customization to the interaction of ROM and hardware, the internal control of the software is more like a native Android.
At the same time, miui is significantly more versatile in terms of its versatility and development of new features. In pursuit of more and more interesting new features of ROM, Miui 8 itself is based on the latest Android 6.1 (in fact, the writing is actually already Android 7, but only Limited to the use of nexus, the influence is very limited. Flyme is much more conservative about the new features, and more emphasis on the maturity and stability of the system (estimated to be called in the Flyme 4.5 phase is called the shadow of the bugme), the latest Flyme 5 is based on Android 5.1 to develop.
Second, UIThe two ROMs used simple, natural, and other words when introducing their own UI, but the difference between the two is obvious. Summarizing, Flyme emphasizes its own design more details than MIUI. It also inherits its advantages in terms of details; MIUI highlights the design from the perspective of integrity and practicality. Seeking fine, but seeking nothing.
a, system icons
Specific to the system icons, Flyme follows the UI style of native ROM since Android 5, that is, discarding the icon backing and directly using the icon content ontology, thus appearing slightly irregular. MIUI inherits the style of Android 5 before, and each icon has a backing as the basis, and then the content of the chart is placed on it. The overall look is more neat. Both styles have their own strengths and their preferences are also insights. However, the style that Flyme learns from is a product under the guidance of the material design concept. The seemingly mimicry that it embodies, but the highly abstracted features, seem more lively to me.
When the third-party application icons and system icons are mixed, it can be seen that the two ROMs have certain optimizations for daily applications, but the Flyme style makes the icons, whether or not optimized, show a certain degree of change. Consistency.
b. Status bar
Both Flyme and MIUI have moved their hands on the status bar, stating that as the most frequent part of user contact, native ROM does not seem to appeal to the people. Flyme 5's status bar is the highlight of Fyme's pre-feeling style. It tries to present everything with the most basic lines, and the use of color blocks is also tempered with anti-color. In contrast, MIUI 8 has a lot of color on the status bar, and even has decorative graphics, and stuffs as much information and functionality as possible.
c, setting menu
After Flyme 5 changed the previous settings menu, Flyme and MIUI had little difference in the design of the settings menu. In terms of design style, Flyme is similar to the original color tone, gray and white, MIUI is enough effort in color, although it is brown color, but it is also a bit brighter.
d, plug-ins
MIUI defaults to the first screen of the plug-in is the clock, and Flyme does not have a separate clock, so select 42 of the weather as a comparison. In general, Flyme has invested a certain amount of energy in these widgets. Overall, it has been customized, and it is more elegant. There is not much effort under MIUI. For example, there are many old-fashioned widgets inherited from native ROM. The degree is limited.
The FirstPower Standard series is desgined for apllcation of general portable purpose . The series is a modern hi-tech energy application product, and the first generation delicate product in our company.
We welcome orders with "FirstPower" brand; We are also flexible to accept orders on OEM basis. Contact us now! Your partnership with FirstPower will prove worthy of it.
Standard Series Battery,Standard Motorcycle Battery,Standard Car Battery,Standard 12V Battery
Firstpower Tech. Co., Ltd. , https://www.firstpowersales.com