[World Wide Web Reporter Lin Di] Recently, the U.S. Army suddenly issued a high-profile ban – all subordinate units have stopped all Chinese drones and related products produced by DJI (DJI) because of the existence of DJI's products. Cyber ​​Security Vulnerabilities, but the latest research shows that this reason has been overturned.
Picture: Dajiang drone was suddenly banned by the U.S. military
According to the foreign media Theverge reported that on August 8, the U.S. federal government announced a previous investigation of UAV drones. Surveys show that Dajiang drones can ensure data security.
Foreign media Theverge said that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), which is responsible for the collection of massive meteorological data, stated that in October 2016, they used the Dajiang S-1000 drone A survey was conducted to "find better whether the drone will collect any data when it transmits data to the Internet during flight or when the data is transferred to the computer for post-processing."
The NOAA test found that the S-1000 drone does not have data leakage threats. “Most of the processing of instructions sent to the Dajiang servers must be logged in to the servers hosted by DJI in the Amazon AWS cloud, and software updates require Linode. Software," NOAA said, using this type of software to handle these transactions is very common, and no abnormalities were found during the experiment. NOAA said, "There is no evidence that any software attempts to transfer any data from the aircraft."
It now appears that the US Army pointed out that there are "network security loopholes" in the product's accusations that NOAA's test results have caused the US Army to "fight." However, support for the U.S. Army’s call to disable drones has found other reasons: for instance, the military may use different data processing units to carry out different tests, or they may be concerned about whether drones will fly when they fly. A third party has the ability to launch an attack on a drone that may intercept the pilot’s control or transmit data via a wireless carrier.
In response, Ed Dumas, NOAA's computer programmer and member of the above-mentioned research report, once again confirmed that during the testing of the S-1000 drone last year, he did not find the drone. Send any unusual sailing message to DJI.
The U.S. military’s action on drones produced by Chinese companies is not without precursors. In May of this year, the U.S. professional drone website SUAS News reported that according to the default settings of the DJI GO 4 application carried by DJI drones, details of flight records including telemetry data, video, and audio will be uploaded to Servers in the United States, China, and Hong Kong. The two reference materials mentioned in the memorandum were all released in May. One is the "Technical Threat and User Vulnerabilities of the Dajiang UAV" of the US Army Research Laboratory, and the other is "About Dajiang Products." Operational Risk" Naval Memorandum.
Why did the U.S. military suddenly find a reason to order the ban on drones?
First of all, let's take a look at what the U.S. military uses Chinese-made UAVs to do.
According to the “Defense One†website of the United States, the Dajiang UAV is the most widely used type of U.S. Army equipment in this category. A total of more than 300 DJI products are in service with the U.S. military. However, Dajiang drones were not used by all U.S. Army, and they were not widely used on the battlefield like U.S.-made drones such as the “Cougarsâ€.
In addition, according to the report of the Columbia Broadcasting Corporation of the United States, a document on the website of the Ministry of National Defense indicates that the Dajiang drone was used in the operations or exercises of the US Army Corps of Engineers, including flood rescue or at the request of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Action.
Wang Ya-nan, editor-in-chief of Aviation Knowledge, told the Global Times that starting from the perspective of the US military, there is indeed reason to order the disabling of products that could endanger national security. After all, the security requirements of civilian products and military products are different in many aspects. However, the problem is that the civil drones of Dajiang were acquired by the U.S. military through shelf-type procurement. They do not meet the security requirements of the U.S. military and originally the US military’s review process is not strictly related. As a result, the U.S. military has high-profile underground bans for the outside world. Create an impression that "Chinese products are problems."
Wang Ya-nan pointed out that the reason why the U.S. military adopted such a treatment may be to please the U.S. arms dealers on the one hand. Such consumer-class drones manufactured by DJI have a wide range of uses in the field of military tactics. The U.S. military verified its performance after a small amount of procurement, and then transferred larger orders to U.S. arms dealers on security excuses. Then, the reason for security may be a "deaf person", and the intention of nurturing local industries is the real purpose. This is in line with the political correctness of the Trump administration's emphasis on "Made in the United States."
On the other hand, China’s drones have become the main challenger to the U.S. in this area these years. After the U.S. military has detained the UAV’s caps with “security problemsâ€, not only will DJI’s reputation in the civil market be met. The impact can also be used to discredit the overall image of the Chinese drone.
Dajiang has repeatedly stressed that Dajiang is not a military enterprise and has never placed drones on the battlefield.
“Dagan created civilian drones for peaceful purposes. They were created for personal and professional use. They were not designed for military use or military standards. We did not sell our products to military customers if the military chose to purchase them. Using our products as the best way to accomplish their tasks, we cannot know who they are or what they are used to do.The specific reason why the U.S. Army abruptly announced that it is forbidden to use UAV drones, the U.S. military No explanation was given, and what they are concerned about is the specific meaning of "network security loopholes." Do they also exclude other drone makers? We also don't know." Dajiang responded to the US military's "network security flaw "Say.
The civilian products made in China are constantly listed on the procurement list of the multinational forces in the world. This is a symbol of China’s increasing strength. The U.S. "Quartz" website commented on the 7th that the U.S. military has always been wary of "made in China." Chinese enterprises have long been plagued with responding to relations with the military or the government, whether this relationship is true or not. For example, the Chinese company's Huawei products in the US have always been a problem. The US military believes that Huawei has relations with the Chinese military. The US government has forbidden its mobile phones from entering the local market until recently.
Germany’s Global News Network stated that the U.S. military’s ownership of Chinese drones has surprised many people and can see the advantages of Chinese drones because the U.S. has always been a military superpower and regards China as a strategic adversary.
Israel’s “Jerusalem Post†stated on the 6th that while the U.S. Army blocked drones, it will continue to use it. This month, the drones ordered by Israel will be delivered to Israel. These drones will be delivered to Israeli infantry in the West Bank and will be used by other border forces.
Specialized Slip Ring,Slip Ring Rotary Joint,Slip Ring Induction Motor Rotor,Induction Motor Slip Ring
Dongguan Oubaibo Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.sliprobs.com